From Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia.
White rice and golden
rice
Golden rice is a variety
of
rice (Oryza sativa)
produced through
genetic modification to
biosynthesise of the
precursors of
beta-carotene (pro-vitamin A)
in the edible parts of rice. The
scientific details of the rice
were first published in
Science in
2000.[1]
Golden rice was developed as a
fortified food to be used in areas
where there is a shortage of
dietary
Vitamin A. In
2005, a new variety called
golden rice 2 was announced, it
produces up to 23 times more
beta-carotene than the original
variety of golden rice.[2]
Neither variety are available for
human consumption.
Although golden rice was
developed as a humanitarian tool
it has met with significant
opposition from environmental and
anti-globalization activists.
Creation of golden rice
A simplified overview of
the carotenoid biosynthesis
pathway. The enzymes
expressed in the endosperm
of golden rice, shown in
red, catalyze the
biosyntheis of beta-carotene
from
geranylgernayl-diphosphate.
Beta-carotene is believed to
be converted to retinal and
subsequently
retinol (vitamin A) in
the animal gut
Golden rice was created by
Ingo Potrykus of the
Institute of Plant Sciences at
the
Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology, working with
Peter Beyer of the
University of Freiburg. The
project started in 1992. At the
time of publication in 2000,
Golden rice was considered a
significant breakthrough in
biotechnology as the researchers
had engineered an entire
biosynthetic pathway.
Golden rice was designed to
produce
Vitamin A precursor
beta-carotene in the part of
rice that people eat, the
endosperm. The rice plant can
produce beta-carotene, it is a
carotenoid that occurs in the
leaves and is involved in
photosynthesis, however the
plant does not normally produce
the pigment in the endosperm since
the endosperm is not a tissue
where photosynthesis takes place.
Golden rice was created by
transforming rice with three
beta-carotene biosynthesis genes:
- psy (photoene
synthase)
- lyc (lycopene cyclase)
both from
daffodil (Narcissus
pseudonarcissus), and
- crt1 from the soil
bacterium
Erwinia uredovora
The psy, lyc and
crt1 genes were transformed
into the nuclear genome and placed
under the control of an endosperm
specific
promoter, so that they are
only expressed in the endosperm.
The lyc gene transfomed
into the rice has a transit
peptide sequence attached so that
it is targeted to the
plastid where
geranylgeranyl-diphosphate
formation occurs. It was important
to use the bacterial gene crt1
since it can catalyze multiple
steps in the synthesis of
carotenoids, these steps require
more than one enzyme in plants.[3]
The end product of the engineered
pathway
lycopene, if the plant
accumulated lycopene the rice
would be red. Recent analysis has
shown that the plant endogenous
enzymes process the lycopene to
beta-carotene in the endosperm,
giving the rice the distinctive
yellow colour for which it is
named.[4]
The original Golden rice was
called SGR1, under greenhouse
conditions it produced 1.6µg/g of
carotenoids.
In
2005 a team of Reseachers at
biotechnology company
Syngenta produced a variety of
golden rice called golden rice 2.
They combined a photoene synthase
gene from
maize with the lyc and
crt1 from the original
golden rice. Golden rice 2,
produces 23 times more carotenoids
than golden rice (up to 37µg/g),
and preferentially accumulates
beta-carotene (up to 31µg/g of the
37µg/g of carotenoids). To meet
recieve half the
Recommended Dietary Allowance
(RDA) it is estimated that 72 g of
this rice would need to be eaten.
Golden rice has been
bred with local rice cultivars
in the
Philippines,
Taiwan and with the American
rice variety Cocodrie, the first
field trials of these golden rice
cultivars were conducted by
Louisiana State University
AgCenter in
2004.[5]
Field testing will allow more
accurate measurment of the
nutritional value of golden rice
and will enable feeding tests to
be performed. Preliminary results
from the field tests shown that
field grown Golden rice produced 3
to 4 times more beta-carotene than
the Golden rice grown under
greenhouse conditions.[6]
In June 2005, researcher Peter
Beyer recieved funding from the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
to further improve Golden rice by
increasing levels of or
bioavailability of pro-vitamin A,
vitamin E, iron, and zinc, and
improve protein quality though
genetic modification.[7]
Golden rice and vitamin A
deficiency
Prevalence of vitamin A
deficiency. Source:
WHO
The research that led to golden
rice was conducted with the goal
of helping the millions of
children who suffer from Vitamin A
deficiency (VAD). At the beginning
of the 21st century, 124 million
people were estimated to be
affected by VAD, people are
affected in 118 counrties in
Africa and
South East Asia. VAD is
responsible for 1-2 million
deaths, 500,000 cases of
irreversible
blindness and millions of
cases of
xerophthalmia annually.[8]
Children and pregnant women are at
highest risk. Vitamin A is
supplemented orally and by
injection in areas where the diet
is deficient in Vitamin A.
As of 1999 there were 43
countries that had vitamin A
supplementation programs for
children under 5, in 10 of those
countries 2 high dose supplements
are available a year, which
according to
UNICEF could effectively
elimiate VAD.[9]
However UNICEF and a number of
NGOs involved in
supplementation note that more
frequent low-dose supplementation
should be a goal where feasible.[10]
Because many children in
countries where there is a dietary
deficiency in Vitamin A rely on
rice as a
staple food, the
genetic modification to make
rice produce provitamin A
(beta-carotene) is seen a simple
and less expensive alternative to
vitamin supplements or an increase
in the consumption of green
vegetables or animal products. It
is seen as the genetically
engineered equivalent of
fluoridated water or
iodized salt.
Theoretical analyses of the
potential nutritional benefits of
golden rice show that consumption
of golden rice would not eliminate
the problems of blindness and
increased mortality, but should be
seen as a complement to other
methods of Vitamin A
supplementation[11].
Golden rice and Golden rice 2 have
not undergone nutritional testing.
Golden rice and intellectual
property issues
Golden rice and
co-creator Professor Ingo
Potrykus on the cover of
TIME magazine, July 2000
Potrykus has spearheaded an
effort to have golden rice
distributed for free to
subsistence
farmers; this required several
companies which had
Intellectual Property rights
to the results of Beyer's research
to license it for free. Beyer had
received funding from the European
Commissions 'Carotene Plus'
research program, by accepting
those funds he was required by law
to give the rights to his
discovery to the corporate
sponsors of that program, Zeneca,
now
Syngenta. Beyer and Poyrykus
has used 70 Intellectual Property
rights belonging to 32 different
companies and universities in the
making of golden rice, they needed
to establish free licences for all
of these so that Syngenta and
humanitarian partners in the
project could use golden rice in
breeding programs and to develop
new crops.[12]
Free licences were granted
quickly due to the positive
publication that golden rice
received; it was the first
genetically modified crop that was
inarguably beneficial, and thus
met with widespread approval.
Monsanto was one of the first
companies to grant the group free
licences.
The group also had to define
the cutoff between humanitarian
and commercial use, this figure
was set at
USD$10 000, therefore as long
as a farmer or subsequent user of
golden rice genetics does not make
more than $10 000, then no
royalties need to be paid to
Syngenta for commercial use.
Objections
Greenpeace initially objected
to the crop on the basis of the
amount of Vitamin A in golden
rice. The first strains developed
had only 1.6 micrograms of
beta-carotene per gram of rice,
which would mean that a person
would have to eat 1.5–2
kg of the rice per day to get
the recommended daily allowance of
provitamin A. However, with the
development of lines with
increased beta carotene Greenpeace
has maintained its objection to
the crop. Greenpeace opposes all
genetically modified organisms,
and is concerned that golden rice
is a
Trojan horse that will "open
the door" to more widespread use
of GMOs[13].
Vandana Shiva, an
Indian anti-GMO activist,
argued that the problem was not
particular deficiencies in the
crops themselves, but problems
with poverty and loss of
biodiversity in food crops.
These problems are aggravated by
the corporate control of
agriculture based on genetically
modified foods. By focusing on a
narrow problem (vitamin A
deficiency), Shiva argued, the
golden rice proponents were
obscuring the larger issue of a
lack of broad availability of
diverse and nutritionally adequate
sources of food.[14]
Similarly other groups have argued
that a varied diet containing
vitamin A rich foods like
sweet potato, leafy green
vegetables and fruit would provide
children with sufficient vitamin
A.[15]
While this is true, a varied diet
is beyond the means of the many of
the poor, which is why they
subsist on a diet of rice.
The aleurone layer that
surrounds the rice endosperm is
removed by processing in most
countries to improve the shelf
life of the rice, this process is
called milling or polishing. Brown
rice with the aleurone intact does
contain more B vitamins, iron,
manganese, selenium, zinc and
phosphorous than milled rice. The
Institute of Science in Society
claims that if rice weren't milled
that supplementation would not be
necessary.[16]
However USDA data shows that brown
rice does not contain any more
beta carotene than milled rice.
[17]
[18]
Scientists at the
International Rice Research
Institute are screening rice
germplasm, and trying
conventional breeding approaches
for breeding varieties with
increased beta carotene in the
aleurone. [19]
Many cultures base the quality
of rice on its whiteness. In spite
of the touted health benefits, due
to the yellow coloring of golden
rice, recipients may not be easily
convinced it is healthier.
References
1. ^
Ye et al. 2000. Engineering the
provitamin A (beta-carotene)
biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free)
rice endosperm.
Science 287 (5451):
303-305
PMID 10634784
2.
^ Paine et al.
2005.
Improving the nutritional value of
Golden Rice through increased
pro-vitamin A content.
Nature Biotechnology
doi:10.1038/nbt1082
3.
^ Hirschberg, J.
2001.
Carotenoid biosynthesis in
flowering plants. Current
Opinion in Plant Biology
4:210-218
4. ^
Schaub, P. et al. 2005. Why Is
Golden Rice Golden (Yellow)
Instead of Red?. Plant
Physiology 138:441–450
5. ^
LSU AgCenter Communications.
‘Golden Rice’ Could Help Reduce
Malnutrition, 2004
6.
^ Goldenrice.org
[1]
7. ^ Grand
Challenges in Global Health,
Press release, June 27, 2005
8.
^ Humphrey, J.H.,
West, K.P. Jr, and Sommer, A.
1992. Vitamin A deficiency and
attributable mortality in
under-5-year-olds.
WHO Bulletin 70: 225-232
9. ^
UNICEF.
Vitamin A deficiency
10. ^
Vitamin A Global Initiative. 1997.
A Strategy for Acceleration of
Progress in Combating Vitamin A
Deficiency
11.
^ Dawe, D.,
Robertson, R. and Unnevehr, L.
2002. Golden rice: what role could
it play in alleviation of vitamin
A deficiency? Food Policy
27:541-560
12.
^ Potrykus, I.
2001. Golden Rice and Beyond.
Plant Physiology 125:1157-1161
13.
^ Greenpeace.
2005.
All that Glitters is not Gold: The
False Hope of Golden Rice
14. ^
Shiva, V.
The Golden Rice Hoax
15. ^
Friends of the Earth.
Golden Rice and Vitamin A
Deficiency
16. ^
Institute of Science in Society.
The 'Golden Rice' - An Exercise in
How Not to Do Science
17.
^ USDA National
Nutrient Database for Standard
Reference.
Rice, brown, long-grain, cooked
18.
^ USDA National
Nutrient Database for Standard
Reference.
Rice, white, long-grain, regular,
cooked
19. ^ International
Rice Research Institute. 2005.
Prgram 3, Annual Report of
the Director General 2004-05